Writers the world over can relate to this. Readers may not be aware that writers write what publishers publish, not the other way around. To be published writers must make compromises. Below is an ilustrative example.
"His own publishers asked him to leave out portions of the book considered too caustic ... it would be seen as unpatriotic. So now it's no longer in the book."
An interview with the writer:
Q: So censorship is dangling over a writer's head, stifling him?
A: Sadly yes. There are things I want to write, but this [censorship] is at the back of my mind.
Q: Are publishers and writers stopping themselves from breaking new ground in that sense?
A: You bet. There are brilliant new writers out there, and I feel terrible because they know their story will not make it, if they write like that.
Q: Because of fear?
A: Sure. At the end of the day, I am a storyteller. And what is a storyteller without his audience?"
There is nothing quite so liberating as a publisher going bancrupt, as in the case of yours truly, allowing one to write what one wants, not what they want.
Snippets from: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/political-intolerance-limits-authors-nagarkar/221172-40-103.html
### END OF POST ###